|
Selfish readersUnlike the Tory Party, the Weekly Worker cannot rely on huge donations. We are not expecting our cash-strapped readers and supporters to come up with £5 million (or will it turn out to be £10 million?). Again unlike the Tories, we do not pretend there is no quid pro quo for the donor. People give to political parties (or political papers) because, at the end of the day, they hope to gain something in return. In the case of an establishment party the pay-off could take the form of legislation favouring a particular sectional interest, the possibility of access to future lucrative contracts or perhaps an eventual peerage. Our readers too expect a return on their investment. What they have in mind though is something far more inspirational than the grubby desires of gambling tycoons or stock market speculators. They share the aspiration of the Weekly Worker to see the birth of a single, democratic centralist Communist Party and understand that their own interests as partisans of our movement are inextricably bound up with those of the working class itself. The birth of this Party will be their ‘reward’. In this spirit, comrades GI, OP and FD have all come up with ‘selfish’ gifts for their paper this week. Their donations have helped give our fund a much needed boost after the slow start towards our monthly £400 target. January’s total now stands at £215. But we still need £185 in less than a week. Are there any more ‘egocentrics’ out there? Robbie Rix |
Number 368Thursday January 25 2001Towards a common Socialist Alliance draft programme - A discussion document submitted by the Communist Party of Great Britain For an SA paper Letters Socialist Alliance reports
CWI crisis: Distortion and misrepresentation Socialist Party: ‘Damaged’ by principled criticism
Party and programme Rail nationalisation campaign: Take control Ours or theirs? |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||