Weekly Worker 386 Thursday May 31 2001
Ipswich
Another defection
A leading member of Ipswich Labour Party joined the Socialist Alliance
last week after deciding “enough was enough”. Andrew Coates, who was secretary
of a Labour Party branch in the town, said that he had been so disappointed
by the performance of the local Labour MP, Jamie Cann, at a hustings on
education on Thursday that he had decided to switch his allegiance. Comrade
Coates has already put a Socialist Alliance poster in the window of his
home and started leafleting.
The news of the defection, and of the Labour Party’s petulant response
to it, made the front page of the local daily paper, The East Anglian
Daily Times. Comrade Coates, who had been an active Labour member
for 12 years, said: “I don’t want to have a Tory government, and Labour
is running a Tory government. The privatisation of the health service
was the main factor in my decision.” He added: “I thought Peter Leech,
the Socialist Alliance candidate, made a creditable case for his party’s
politics. To me the alliance’s politics on education make sense. I had
a grant when I went to university, but New Labour has abolished grants
and introduced student fees.” In an answer to a question about tuition
fees Cann had claimed that it was one of the hard choices governments
had to make.
The Labour Party certainly did itself no favours at the meeting that
precipitated comrade Coates’s departure from the party. Faced with an
audience made up of a number of sceptical teachers and hostile leftwingers,
Cann quickly subsided into a defiant bunker attitude. For instance, in
answer to one question about the excessive hours teachers were expected
to do he first denied that teachers were working longer hours now than
20 years ago and then added that, in any case, professional people did
not count their hours and should grin and bear it.
The alliance is busy distributing leaflets: at the major Sunday push
13 people turned out to help on one estate, and more leafleting is planned
for every evening this week with stalls publicising the organisation’s
policies. The leafleting sessions are developing into major seminars about
politics and the way forward between people who before the formation of
the alliance would have hardly spoken to each other.
Frank Rogerson
Greenwich and Woolwich
Looking to the future
While energetically campaigning for our candidate, Kirstie Paton (Workers
Power), members of the Greenwich and Woolwich SA managed to make time
for a fruitful discussion last week. The May 24 meeting was scheduled
to hear a speaker from the Dudley hospital dispute. However, the strikers
had sent apologies and the agenda was changed to reports of the Dudley
and postal strikes and a general political opening by comrade Paton.
The 30-plus meeting, scheduled as a public event, was entirely made up
of the left. The Socialist Workers Party, who usually comprise an absolute
majority, were on this occasion outnumbered by a large contingent from
Workers Power, its youth section, Revolution, the Alliance for Workers’
Liberty and International Bolshevik Tendency, together with members of
the Republican Communist Network, CPGB and a lone unaffiliated comrade.
Andy Reid (SWP) reported that the Dudley strike had ended the day before
with the transfer of all staff to a PFI company. Comrade Reid stated that
the strikers considered that their long and resolute fight against privatisation
had been a success in so far as they had held out for so long and so publicly;
also because they had decided to return not bowed or beaten - but ready
to fight to maintain wages and conditions. Comrade Reid went on to castigate
the official union bureaucracy who did little to back the strike.
The Dudley and postal workers’ strikes were an “underlying reason for
the existence of the SA”, even though it was an electoral alliance, said
comrade Reid. This simple yet balanced report, whilst only alluding
to the role the SA could play beyond the election, whilst not yet making
explicit the inescapable logic of forming a party, raised it to the top
of the agenda - all of the following discussions revolved around the fundamental
question: what next?
Ian Crosson (SWP) followed with a report on the unofficial postal workers’
strike. He began in ebullient mood, saying that it was the first time
in 20 years he had been on two pickets in two days - he had also been
out in support of members of the National Association of Teachers in Further
and Higher Education, who had backed the union call for a one-day strike
in support of their pay claim. Comrade Crosson highlighted the significance
of the action by members of the Communication Workers Union.
Contrasting the Natfhe and CWU pickets, he reported that all of the lecturers
had heard of the SA, whereas most postal workers had not. He went on to
say that the SA had certainly picked up votes by joining the postal workers’
picket and declaring our support for the strike. Another SWP comrade,
Monica Axon, who had been down to the Dartford sorting office, reported
how scabbing managers had donned overalls to sort mail through the night
and then drive Royal Mail vans the following morning. SWP full-timer Hannah
Dee made a very upbeat contribution about the revival of class struggle
and pointed to the role the SA could play in building support.
Whilst there has been a noticeable upturn in strike actions - and the
unofficial strike by postal workers was certainly a breath of fresh air
- there is a tendency for younger, less experienced comrades, to get overexcited
by these developments. A more sober and strategic view was offered by
George McColl (WP). Referring to the CWU as one of the most rightwing
unions, comrade McColl said that there was, nevertheless, a great tradition
of militancy amongst the rank and file of that union. However, this was
not yet translated into a socialist consciousness, said comrade
McColl.
The reality of four years of New Labour had shifted the attitude of a
section of regional and district officers, and a resolution to CWU conference
to allow support for candidates other than Labour (similar to that recently
agreed by the Fire Brigades Union) was now on the table. This provided
“opportunities for the SA as a party to put down roots in the working
class”, argued comrade McColl - implicit here was the aim of developing
exactly the socialist consciousness now lacking.
During a broad-ranging political opening comrade Paton had marked the
recent FBU decision as a historic shift from automatic support for Labour.
This, however, was in contradiction to the advice Workers Power gives
to voters where there is no SA candidate.
There followed one comrade after another from Workers Power, the CPGB,
AWL and Revolution all arguing for a party - most wanting a revolutionary
party and not a rerun of Labour. Many suggested we already have a party
in practice. Comrade Reid, however, reflecting the SWP’s tentative approach,
thought it necessary to first achieve a respectable vote and then “see
where we go”. He noted that this was the “first time there had been a
serious left challenge since Phil Piratin and Willie Gallagher”.
When it came to activities, our committee had decided upon yet another
public meeting in the week before the election. I referred to the advice
of SA national officers, who argued that ‘preaching to the converted’
in public meetings was not a priority in the last two weeks. I then went
on to disagree with another part of the national officers’ advice in arguing
for a push on canvassing: we need to talk face to face with as many workers
as possible.
Comrade Dee argued that we did not have the resources to canvass, adding
that we had a last chance to “pull people in” with a public meeting. The
vote was overwhelmingly for the proposal. With a week to organise and
going on our actual experience thus far, I expect we will have another
nice meeting amongst ourselves.
Perhaps the recent mini-wave of industrial action has infiltrated the
consciousness of secondary school students at Crown Woods school. On Friday
about half of year 10, plus some year eights and nines went on strike
against the new, £90,000-a-year ‘super headmaster’. This New Labour wonder
boy is radically altering school hours after a rigged ballot - parents
had to decide between two options, both of which amounted to ‘agree with
me’. Or if they failed to vote, that was also taken as acceptance.
The headteacher also intends to lock the kids in at lunchtime and bring
in private caterers. He has a raft of plans for attracting “investment”.
Crown Woods, though not officially one of the PFI schools, is apparently
a wonderful business opportunity. The impromptu strike lasted one and
a half hours and gained sympathy from dinner ladies and a number of teachers.
The superhead ended the strike by dishing out exclusions to ‘ringleaders’.
Shades of Blairism, second term.
Alan Stevens
Teesside
Labour scared
A regional Labour Party rally and a 10-hour open air indie-rock festival
were both targets for the Socialist Alliance campaigning drive on Teesside
last bank holiday weekend.
As comrades from Middlesbrough SA began the penultimate week of the general
election campaign, the first port of call for our parliamentary candidate,
Geoff Kerr-Morgan, was the Labour rally. About half a dozen comrades from
across Teesside arrived at noon on Saturday May 25 to picket outside the
University of Teesside’s Centuria Lecture Hall, where comrades had been
told by university workers that a prominent Labour figure would be speaking
later that day. Neither the local nor national press had publicised the
event; the hall had allegedly been booked in the strictest confidence
by an organisation which “did not wish to be identified”.
It later unfolded that the meeting was reserved for selectively chosen
local Labour Party members only, to hear an address by culture secretary
Chris Smith, apparently on the subject of ‘Saving the NHS’. Typical of
New Labour’s lack of internal democracy and elitist culture, rank and
file party members who arrived at the door were turned away by an official,
who assertively told them that the meeting was for “invited members only”.
When questioned as to why a party supposedly representative of ordinary
people wished to avoid meetings between senior ministers and its local
membership, the Labour door minder declined to comment. It is blatantly
obvious, however, that this was a concerted effort by the party bureaucracy
to avoid any confrontation between the advocates of New Labour’s Toryism
and the rank and file, who still cling to the memory of Labour as a party
claiming to represent workers. Unsurprisingly, Labour would not like to
publicise the fact that widespread discontent has permeated a significant
proportion of its membership base two weeks before a general election.
Needless to say, many of those who were turned away on Saturday made
it clear that they would not be voting for Blair’s party this June, but
the socialist alternative offered by the alliance. “I have voted Labour
all my life,” one Labour member told Middlesbrough MP Stuart Bell indignantly,
“but I cannot vote for you again.” Bell did not as much as look at her
as he was ushered into the building.
The party officers manning the door were far from talkative when asked
about their personal thoughts, views and beliefs in relation to
Blair’s rightwing, pro-business style of tenure. However, one official
did let slip that he had recently met with St Helens candidate Sean Woodward,
the ex-Tory millionaire whom Blair has parachuted into the safe Labour
seat, commenting that he “made my skin crawl”.
SA comrades watched behind a glass wall as Chris Smith greeted an array
of nurses and trade union officials, all evidently chosen prior to the
event for their loyalty to the Labour elite and unquestioning advocacy
of the party line.
Following on from Saturday’s intervention, Teesside Socialist Alliance
once again went to work on bank holiday Monday to descend upon the ‘Middlesbrough
Music Live’ open air festival, where Indie-rockers Shed Seven and Space
headlined, alongside a range of other bands and artists from across the
country.
It was not only the beautiful (although frequently unusual) harmonies
that were music to the ears of SA comrades, but the considerable number
of people who pledged their vote to the alliance. Some initially told
leafleters that they were planning to vote with their feet on June 7,
unaware that the SA was standing a candidate in the area. This once again
highlighted the possibility that a huge constituency of potential sympathy
lies untapped: we still have considerable ground to cover if we are to
reach all of our target audience - traditional Labour voters, anti-establishment
youth - before June 7.
Hundreds of leaflets were thrown into the air above the 3,000 festival-goers
congregated around the main stage in Middlesbrough Boulevard, before being
carried by the breeze to every corner of the audience arena. This rather
intuitive venture proved successful when a number of indie fans approached
comrade Kerr-Morgan asking for further information. Hopefully, those who
took an interest and pledged support will spread the socialist
message to others around them before polling day.
James Bull
Latino support
In the UK there are more than 200,000 Latinos. Their main newspaper is
Noticias (News) - read by 100,000 people. Every month it carries
many articles on the Spanish and Portuguese world with a few comments
on British politics.
The paper does not have a line on the UK general election, but in the
current issue (June) the only piece that deals with June 7 calls on Latinos
to support the Socialist Alliance - the only force that is against visas
and immigration controls and the abuse of immigrant workers, for full
citizenship to all immigrants, for the cancellation of the foreign debt.
Juan Ponce
|