Not bullyingI have highlighted on more than one occasion the large number of web readers who do not contribute financially to the paper they obviously value so much (the last issue of the Weekly Worker was accessed by 16,545 individual sessions). But, as OG points out, surfers are not the only ones who do not always put their hands in their pocket: “Re your appeal in the December 19 issue,” writes the comrade, “I realise now that I am another sort of ‘freeloader’, in that I always read a copy of the Weekly Worker passed on to me by a friend. I enclose £10 to cover some ‘freebie issues’ so far. I will endeavour to do so regularly in future!” Thanks for the cheque, comrade. It helped to push up our final fund of 2002 to £424. But, whatever my persuasive skills, they just don’t seem to be quite good enough - our total deficit for the year went up to £117. Admittedly, this is not disastrous, but in a situation where we are faced with increasing costs still serious. Even though we fell short last year, we have decided to raise our monthly target to £500 for 2003. If we did not do so, there really would be problems ahead. However, if the first week of January is anything to go by, our confidence in our readers will be rewarded. Already I have received sizable donations from TR (£30), AM (£25), PJ and FC (£20 each). Thanks also to GR (£10) and RT (£5), all of which takes our January total to £110 - just short of the going rate to meet the new £500 target. Let’s hope many more readers will respond as OG has this year! Robbie Rix Ask for a bankers order form, or send cheques, payable to Weekly Worker, BCM Box 928, London WC1N 3XX
|
Number 462Thursday January 9 2003The Weekly Worker is available from bookshops across the United Kingdom or can be delivered direct to your door by completing our online subscription form. Legalise all drugs Letters Insular bubble STWC gravediggers Europe against the war Stop war drive Matgamnas platonic republic - part 5 Piercing the Luton fog Firefighter selected SA organisation needed Marxist analysis or crying wolf? Unity for two states |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||