Enjoy
the
Weekly Worker?
How about
showing us your appreciation? Producing the Weekly Worker costs a substantial
amount of money. Our only source for that financial backing comes from
people like you: readers and supporters of our newspaper. You may not
agree with the CPGB on every dot and comma, but we know that 1000s of
comrades appreciate our open, critical and democratic press
Send cheques, payable to CPGB, BCM Box 928,
London WC1N 3XX or donate online:
|
|
Weekly Worker 549 Thursday October 21 2004
More
articles on the ESF can
be found by clicking here
For a programme of the European left
The Call of the assembly of social movements reproduced below
was discussed and amended in meetings held during the ESF. Compared to the
first draft (see Weekly Worker October 14), it is quite an improvement.
This is the closest to a political programme that the European left has
- a sad reflection of the lack of cooperation and coordination of our forces.
The existing international formations are either sectarian clone-structures
(International Socialist Tendency, Fourth International, League for the
Fifth International, etc). Or, like the European Left Party, they are based
solely on the need to come together to contest European Union elections.
Our call - a bit of a hotchpotch - therefore reflects the strengths and
weaknesses of the main revolutionary and socialist parties across Europe:
Rifondazione Comunista, Ligue Communiste Révolutionnaire, Communist
Party of France, Socialist Workers Party, etc. Officially of course, they
are not allowed to participate as political parties in the ESF. But by now
everybody knows who in reality is speaking on behalf of which party and
how much weight their voice has.
This call is more concrete on our objections to the European Unions
proposed constitution than the previous draft. However, while the overwhelming
majority of those organisations involved in drawing it up are against the
EU constitution, we are not allowed to make this the general thrust of the
declaration: some organisations - particularly, of course, some of the main
trade union federations across Europe, as well as the European Trade Union
Confederation - are advocating a yes in referendums.
The demand for an immediate withdrawal of forces from Iraq was
also rejected. Some of the French organisations seem to believe that mass
slaughter and chaos would follow automatically if the troops were to go
immediately - instead, British and US troops are to keep order
for the time being. They also introduced the formulation in the section
on Palestine, according to which we should call for an end to the Israeli
occupation, following the judgement of the UN International Court
of Justice and the unanimous vote of the European countries in the UN general
assembly. This formulation seems to imply that we can only support
this correct demand because those reactionary bourgeois institutions have
done so first.
But our call now also includes the right to choose an abortion.
Combined with the twice-stated demand for the free movement of people,
it is well to the left of Respects political platform.
While it was very fruitful to have three days worth of discussion
on the call, the assembly itself (on the Sunday morning) was as dull and
stage-managed as last years. Over 30 speakers were chosen the night
before, at a small preparatory meeting. Only those groups who stayed until
after 10pm were able to get a speaker in. There were no contributions from
the floor and many activists were very annoyed by the lack of real discussion
during the assembly itself.
|