CPGB online Tuesday October 16 2007
Subscribe
to the Weekly Worker
From the SWP's Party Notes
Party discipline
Last weekend 3 SWP members - Rob Hoveman, Kevin Ovenden and Nick Wrack
were expelled from the SWP.
Kevin and Rob
Kevin and Rob are SWP members working for George Galloway. However,
recently this situation has become increasingly difficult. The party leadership
has come to believe that it was impossible to have two comrades working
for someone who has openly attacked the SWP in recent months. This was
a position several leading members of the SWP articulated at the recent
Party Council. Also over the last year there have been a number of
meetings between the CC and Rob and Kevin.
At these meetings the CC raised major concerns with the way both
these comrades worked in Respect. We believe that they were more concerned
with promoting George Galloway’s line in Respect than the SWP’s position.
More seriously, they have denounced the SWP to individuals and organisations
outside the Party.
Two members of the CC met with Kevin and Rob last week, they were asked
to resign their posts in George Galloway’s office. Kevin and Rob have
subsequently written to the CC refusing to stop working for George
Galloway despite the party’s concerns.
Nick
The recent Respect NC voted to create a new position of National Officer.
The SWP believed that the post was created to undermine Respect National
Secretary John Rees. However, after some changes to the way the post was
defined, the SWP agreed to setting up of the post. George Galloway then suggested
that Nick did the job. Nick said he would seek various people’s opinions.
The SWP made it clear that we didn’t think Nick should accept the job
because he had publicly disagreed with the line being put by the party
about Respect. This would have created confusion in the Respect national office.
Nick met with two members of the CC and agreed to accept party discipline
and not take the post. Several days later his name was put forward by a
member of International Socialist Group for the post. When asked, Nick
refused to withdraw his name saying he had changed his mind and now wanted
his name to go forward.
Despite a further meeting with two members of the CC and several
phone calls, Nick refused to withdraw from standing for the post. There
are occasions when the CC may ask a comrade not to take a post, perhaps
a full time trade union position, or promotion to a job that puts someone
in an untenable position. Nick was therefore expelled because he
refused to work under the direction of the SWP leadership and reneged
on the agreement he made with the CC.
It is important to make one thing clear, the three comrades have not been
expelled because they disagreed with the Central Committee. It is because
they failed to accept Party discipline and worked against the nationally
agreed SWP line.
Expelling comrades is not something the CC does lightly, but in all
three cases we felt we had no choice.
Print this page
|